Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Article for Kayla's Presentation

No Financial Aid, No Problem. For-Profit University Sets $199-a-Month Tuition for Online Courses, from the Chronicle of Higher Education

Article for Keltie's Presentation

After Shootings at Oikos U., a Scholar Urges a Nuanced Look at Stereotypes and Bullying, from the Chronicle of Higher Education.

Article for Ida's Presentation

Florida Charter Schools Failing Disabled Students, from National Public Radio.

Educational Statistics, Media, and Poverty.

An interesting commentary on the Education Week blog on a recent study of American education:

Poverty is, in fact, the issue. While American students' scores on international tests are not as bad as critics say they are, they are even better when we control for the effects of poverty: Middle-class students in well-funded schools, in fact, score at or near the top of world. Our average scores are respectable but unspectacular because, as Farhi notes, we have such a high percentage of children living in poverty, the highest of all industrialized countries. Only four percent of children in high-scoring Finland, for example, live in poverty. Our rate of poverty is over 21%.

The implications of this fact are enormous: It means that the "problem" of American education is not ineffective teaching, not teachers' unions, not lack of national standards and tests, and not schools of education: It is poverty.

This conclusion is supported by additional evidence: High poverty means, among other things, lack of food and lack of quality food, lack of health care, and lack of access to books. There is massive evidence documenting the pernicious effect of hunger, illness and limited reading material have on school performance. The best teaching in the world has limited effects when children are hungry, sick and have little to read.